Vendor data offboarding software

Relationships end. Governance doesn’t.

Contracts require vendors to return or destroy your data when a relationship ends. Fimi Data coordinates those deletion requests, scores the evidence vendors send back, and keeps an audit-ready record of every termination.

A professional in a bright corner office looks out over the city at sunset

The clause

Your contracts already require it.

Framework / sourceRelevant obligation
GDPRArt. 28(3)(g)Return or deletion of personal data after processing services end.
HIPAA§164.504(e)Return or destruction of protected health information at termination, where feasible.
CCPA / CPRAService provider & contractor obligationsDeletion obligations can extend to service providers and contractors handling consumer data.
SOC 2Data lifecycle & disposal controlsControl expectations include secure disposal and management of data through its lifecycle.

Return or destroy is in the DPA, the BAA, the MSA. The clause was never the problem.

The reality

Then the contract ends, and someone sends an email.

“Confirming all data has been deleted per our agreement.”

An email. No scope, no method, no timestamp, no signatory authority, no exceptions. It proves someone replied, not that deletion happened.

It gets filed. Two years later, an auditor asks for it.

The standard

Proof has six parts.

  1. ScopeSystems, data sets, and copies, backups included.
  2. SubprocessorsWho held it downstream, and their proof.
  3. MethodHow it was destroyed, against a recognized standard.
  4. TimingWhen it happened, with a date of destruction.
  5. AttestationSigned by someone who can bind the vendor.
  6. ExceptionsWhat was retained, why, and for how long.

Fimi scores every submission against these six. Hold a vendor's reply to this standard and most don't pass. That's the point.

offboard.fimidata.com / deletion-requests · evidence review
Fimi Data evidence review: a vendor's deletion evidence scored for adequacy and confidence, with the reviewer decision
Evidence review screenshot

The review

Here’s one that didn’t.

Flagged as insufficient before anyone signs off.

A vendor’s response to a deletion request, reviewed in Fimi.

  • Adequacy 21/100Did the vendor send enough? None of the six required evidence elements are present.
  • Confidence 16/100Should you believe what was sent? Seven open findings say not yet.
  • Findings by severityEach gap is listed for follow-up.

The score makes the gap visible. Your team decides what happens next.

The system

Now make it every termination.

Fimi Data is the system of record for vendor data offboarding and deletion assurance. Four steps, one defensible record.

01

Trigger

A contract end, an M&A event, or a manual request starts the workflow automatically.

02

Orchestrate

Tasks are assigned, vendors are notified, and timelines and accountability are set.

03

Verify

Evidence is collected, evaluated, and scored against a defined deletion assurance standard.

04

Prove

Audit-ready records that support regulatory inquiries and customer assurance.

See the platform
Ellie Sharp, Founder and CEO of Fimi Data, at her desk

The founder

“We can assess vendor risk, but can we prove what happens to our data when the relationship ends?”
Ellie SharpFounder & CEO

Twenty years of asking that question at Stanford, Worldpay, and Paylocity. The answer was always a scramble through old email. That’s why I started Fimi Data.

Proof over promises.

See how Fimi Data closes the gap between vendor termination and defensible evidence of data deletion in a 30-minute demo.